Satellite fathers in child protection services

Satellite fathers in child protection services

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-Vol24-Issue1-fulltext-3111

Keywords:

protección a la infancia, padres satelites, discursos profesionales, desigualdad de género

Abstract

The role of fathers in child protection services has received increasing attention at the international level. Literature shows a systematic lack of paternal involvement in these interventions, causing their invisibility and scarce representation, meanwhile mothers are the ones mostly summoned. This article analyzes the results of a qualitative study conducted in Chile, focused on the discursive constructions of parenthood and its gender implications. The analysis was based on a review of case files and interviews with professionals from three child protection agencies. Based on the identification of thematic axes, discursive aspects were analyzed in the way of articulating the understandings of the cases. The findings reveal coincidences with international trends, but also identify a specific discourse that describes parents as “satellites”, reflecting cultural constructions that reinforce gender inequality. This discourse contributes to the exoneration of parents in situations of violence and to the unequal allocation of parental responsibilities.

Author Biography

Cristhie Mella-Aguilera, Universidad Bernardo O'Higgins

Psychologist, Master's Degree in Criminology and Forensic Psychology, PhD in Social Policy.
Lecturer at the School of Psychology at the Bernardo O'Higgins University; School of Psychology at the Catholic University of Temuco; and at the Department of Social Work at the Pontifical Catholic University of Valparaíso.

References

Amato, V. (2018). The social construction of a possible male gender bias is negatively impacting fathers in child welfare services: hammering a square peg into a round hole. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 28(4), 466-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2018.1426071

Archer-Kuhn, B., & de Villiers, S. (2019). Gendered practices in child protection: shifting mother accountability and father invisibility in situations of domestic violence. Social Inclusion, 7(1), 228-237. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v7i1.1768

Brito, S., Basualto, L., Azócar, R., & Flores, C. (2024). Marentalidades y parentalidades positivas: un estudio desde las narrativas de adultos/as responsables pertenecientes al programa de Prevención Focalizada (PPF). Revista Austral de Ciencias Sociales, 46, 223-245. https://doi.org/10.4206/rev.austral.cienc.soc.2024.n46-11

Brown, L., Callahan, M., Strega, S., Walmsley, C., & Dominelli, L. (2009). Manufacturing ghost fathers: the paradox of father presence and absence in child welfare. Child & Family Social Work, 14(1), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00578.x

Campos, C., & Saldaña, L. (2018). Relaciones de género y arreglos en parejas de profesionales: ejecución v/s responsabilización. Revista Estudos Feministas, 26(2), e42931. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9584-2018v26n242931

Castellano-Díaz, R., Martín, J. C., & Alemán, P. F. (2024). Perception of father absence in family assessment and intervention: are they not involved because they don’t want to be? Journal of Social Work Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2024.2411045

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2016). Thematic analysis. In E. Lyons & A. Coyle (Ed.), Analysing qualitative data in Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 84-103). Sage.

Coyle, A. (2016). Discourse analysis. In E. Lyons & A. Coyle (Ed.), Analysing qualitative data in Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 161-181). Sage.

Creswell, J., & Poth, C. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Sage.

Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: the discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x

De Simone, T. & Heward-Belle, S. (2020). Evidencing better child protection practice: why representations of domestic violence matter. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 32(4), 403-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2020.1840957

Dominelli, L., Strega, S., Walsmley, C., Callahan, M., & Brown, L. (2011). Here’s my story: fathers of looked after children recount their experiences in the Canadian child welfare system. The British Journal of Social Work, 41(2), 351-367. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq099

Ewart-Boyle, S., Manktelow, R., & McColgan, M. (2015). Social work and the shadow father: Lessons for engaging fathers in Northern Ireland. Child & Family Social Work, 20(4), 470-479. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12096

Fairclough, N. (2023). Análisis crítico del discurso (D.G. Rojas, Trans.). In J. P. Gee and M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed.; pp. 11-22). Longman. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003035244-1

Fitz-Gibbon, K., Maher, J. M., McCulloch, J., & Segrave, M. (2019). Understanding and responding to family violence risks to children: evidence-based risk assessment for children and the importance of gender. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 52(1), 23-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865818760378

Harne, L. (2011). Violent fathering and the risks to children: The need for change. Policy Press.

Hernández, R., & Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw Hill.

Hester, M. (2011). The three-planet model: Towards an understanding of contradictions in approaches to women and children’s safety in contexts of domestic violence. The British Journal of Social Work, 41(5), 837-853. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr095

Holt, S. (2015). Post-separation fathering and domestic abuse: challenges and contradictions. Child Abuse Review, 24(3), 210-222. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2264

Katz, E., Nikupeteri, A., & Laitinen, M. (2020). When coercive control continues to harm children: post-separation fathering, stalking and domestic violence. Child Abuse Review, 29(4), 310-324. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2611

Kuskoff, E., Parcell, C., Plague, S., Perales, F., & Ablaza, C. (2024). Of good mothers and violent fathers: negotiating child protection interventions in abusive relationships. Violence Against Women, 30(10) 2531-2548. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012231158107

MacDonald, G. (2017). Hearing children’s voices? Including children’s perspectives on their experiences of domestic violence in welfare reports prepared for the English courts in private family law proceedings. Child Abuse & Neglect, 65, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.12.013

Meysen, T., & Kelly, L. (2018). Child protection systems between professional cooperation and trustful relationships: a comparison of professional practical and ethical dilemmas in England/Wales, Germany, Portugal and Slovenia. Child & Family Social Work, 23(2), 222-229. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12403

Miller, K., Arellanes, J., & James, L. (2022). Support father engagement: What can we learn from fathers? Journal of Family Diversity in Education, 4(2), 95-114. https://doi.org/10.53956/jfde.2022.151

Milner, J. (1993). A disappearing act: the differing career paths of fathers and mothers in child protection investigations. Critical Social Policy, 13(38), 48-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/02610 1839301303 803

Mulkeen, M. (2012). Gendered processes in child protection: mother-child blaming and the erosion of men’s accountability. Irish Journal of Applied Social Studies, 12(1), 74-87.

Nygren, K., Walsh J., Ellingsen, I. T., & Christie A. (2019). What about the fathers? The presence and absence of the father in social work practice in England, Ireland, Norway, and Sweden: a comparative study. Child & Family Social Work, 24(1), 148-155. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12592

Olavarría, J. (2017). Sobre hombres y masculinidades: ponerse los pantalones. Universidad Academia de Humanismo Cristiano.

Olszowy, L., Jaffe, P. G., Dawson, M., Straatman, A., & Saxton, M. D. (2020). Voices from the frontline: child protection workers’ perspectives on barriers to assessing risk in domestic violence cases. Children and Youth Services Review, 116, 105208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105208

Parton, N., Thorpe, D., & Wattam, C. (1997). Child protection, risk and the moral order. Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24072-2

Pérez-Díaz, P. A., & Oyarce Cádiz, D. (2020). Burnout parental en Chile y género: un modelo para comprender el burnout en madres chilenas. Revista de Psicología, 29(1), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.5354/0719-0581.2020.57987

Pérez, F., Ruiz, R., & Morales, L. (2021). Coparentalidad en construcción: cómo se coordinan las parejas con la llegada del primer hijo o hija. Psykhe, 30(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.7764/psykhe.2019.22225

Pérez-Vaisvidovsky, N., Halpern, A., & Mizrahi, R. (2023). A systemic perspective on father engagement with child-and family-related social work interventions in Israel. In A. Tarrant, L. Ladlow & L. Way (Eds.), Men and welfare. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003178811

Pérez-Vaisvidovsky, N., Halpern, A., Mizrahi, R., & Atalla, Z. (2024). Single moms, absent dads: neglecting fathers and burdening mothers in social work practice with separated families. European Journal of Social Work, 27(1), 205-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2023.2222927

Phillip, G., Clifton, J., & Brandon, M. (2019). The trouble with fathers: The impact of time and gendered-thinking on working relationships between fathers and social workers in child protection practice in England. Journal of Family Issues, 40(16), 2288-2309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X18792682

Radford, L., & Hester, M. (2015). More than a mirage? Safe contact for children and young people who have been exposed to domestic violence. In N. Stanley & C. Humphreys (Eds.), Domestic violence and protecting children: new thinking and approaches (pp. 112-129). Jessica Kingsley.

Scourfield, J. (2003). Gender and child protection. Palgrave Macmillan.

Scourfield, J., Davies, J., Jones, K., & Maxwell, N. (2024). Improving children’s services engagement of fathers in child protection: logic model for an organisational development and staff training intervention. International Journal on Child Maltreatment: Research, Policy and Practice, 7, 607-614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42448-024-00206-y

Silverman, D. (2014). Interpreting qualitative data (5th ed.). Sage.

Skehill, C., Satka, M., & Hoikkala, S. (2012). Exploring innovative methodologies in time and place to analyse child protection documents as elements of practice. Qualitative Social Work, 12(1), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325011416878

Smith, J., & Humphreys, C. (2019). Child protection and fathering where there is domestic violence: contradictions and consequences. Child & Family Social Work, 24(1), 156-163. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12598

Stanley, N. (1997). Domestic violence and child abuse: developing social work practice. Child & Family Social Work, 2(3), 135-146. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2206.1997.00052.x

Stark, E., & Hester, M. (2019). Coercive control: update and review. Violence Against Women, 25(1), 81-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218816191

Symonds, J. (2020). Making fathers relevant: How practitioners include both parents in talk about parenting programmes. Child & Family Social Work, 25(1), 144-153. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12672

Thiara, R. K., & Humphreys, C. (2017). Absent presence: the ongoing impact of men’s violence on the mother-child relationship. Child & Family Social Work, 22(1), 137-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12210

UK Department for Education. (2021). “The myth of invisible men”: safeguarding children under 1 from non-accidental injury caused by male carers. The Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/safeguarding-children-under-1-year-old-from-non-accidental-injury

Wild, J. (2023). Gendered discourses of responsibility and domestic abuse victim-blame in the English children’s social care system. Journal of Family Violence, 38, 1391-1403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00431-4

Zanoni, L., Warburton, W., Bussey, K., & McMaugh, A. (2013). Fathers as core business in child welfare and research: An interdisciplinary review. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(7), 1055-1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.04.018

Published

2025-03-07 — Updated on 2025-03-13

How to Cite

Mella-Aguilera, C. (2025). Satellite fathers in child protection services. Psicoperspectivas, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-Vol24-Issue1-fulltext-3111

Issue

Section

Research Articles
Loading...